DPO Radio

A useful legal library needs to explain where a document came from, which version was reviewed and what the firm is permitted to do with it. A title or successful download cannot answer all three questions.
Source reviewers also need to distinguish an official consultation draft from enacted law and a document check from a determination of legal effect. Losing these distinctions can mislead later research.
The legal-source workflow combines installed references with governed firm imports. Exact-version review, recorded usage rights and source-change inspection give lawyers a basis for deciding what to select for their Matter.

Browse the installed regulatory catalogue and available recorded source wording. Check lifecycle, provenance and coverage separately from summaries; installation does not establish applicability to a client.
Authorized importers can register metadata and use supported files or specifically allowlisted official document links. Storage, AI use and redistribution are separate rights to inspect before use.
A different authorized reviewer checks the imported version before publication to the firm library. Source review does not establish legal effect, and a consultation draft retains its draft classification.
Configured document checks record their schedule, outcome and last successful check. Matter users can inspect old/current reviewed versions and deliberately select a source without rewriting earlier citations or dossiers.



The firm can distinguish source publication from a legal-effect determination.

A reviewer can inspect the old and current originals before a replacement selection.

Existing research retains its original version instead of silently adopting a new one.
Review the workflow with representative synthetic records and the roles your firm intends to use.

Automatic checks cover configured documents and their recorded schedule. They do not discover every new government-portal link or establish complete Vietnamese legal coverage.
Last successful document check records an actual successful check of that configured document. Legal effect and applicability remain separate review questions supported by their own provenance.
A different currently authorized reviewer must inspect the exact version before publication to the firm library. That source review is not blanket approval of later versions or a determination that the instrument applies.
Storage permission does not itself authorize AI use or redistribution. Current source rights and the intended use must be checked before content enters research or is shared.
Users inspect the old and current reviewed versions and explicitly select the intended source. Earlier research, quotations and dossiers retain their original versions rather than being silently rewritten.

Discuss the deployment, audience and source-rights requirements for an agreed evaluation.

Talk to us about your firm's legal source imports, version reviews and usage rights.