DPO Radio

Law 116/2025/QH15 is Vietnam's consolidated cybersecurity law. On 1 July 2026, Article 44(2) ended both the Cybersecurity Law 24/2018/QH14 and the Law on Network Information Security 86/2015/QH13, as amended by Law 35/2018/QH14. Records and transition obligations from both regimes still matter.
Status: in force since 1 July 2026.
The obligations apply now. If a system already had a security level under Law 86/2015/QH13 and Decree 85/2016/NĐ-CP, Article 45(1) preserves it and gives twelve months from that date, to 30 June 2027, to meet this Law's conditions, standards and protection measures for that level. For organisations that were already classified, that deadline is the live piece of work.
The work spans incident response, authority requests, information and data security, provider content action, protection for vulnerable users, security controls and localization readiness. It crosses legal, security, technology, trust-and-safety and management teams, so clear ownership and evidence matter as much as the written policy.
Provider deadlines are short.
Domestic and foreign providers of telecommunications, Internet or value-added cyberspace services in Vietnam have 24 hours to act on a request from the Ministry of Public Security's specialist cybersecurity force (Article 25(2)(b)). Acting means blocking sharing, deleting unlawful information, or removing the affected service or application. The window is six hours when the request concerns an emergency threat to national security. These are deadlines for acting on a request, not general incident-report deadlines.
The 15% budget rule is for the public sector.
Article 38(1) requires named state bodies, state enterprises, political and socio-political organizations, and publicly funded service units to budget for cybersecurity. Their minimum 15% applies to the total budget of qualifying digital-transformation and IT investment programmes, schemes and projects. It is not a universal percentage for private businesses.
Penalties are now final law.
Decree 330/2026/NĐ-CP, in force since 19 August 2026, sets sanctions for both cybersecurity and personal data protection in one instrument. Cybersecurity fines are stated per individual, with organizations fined at twice that level, up to a ceiling of 200 million VND for an organization. The earlier shared draft was superseded. Government Resolution 22/2026/NQ-CP temporarily changes some personal data protection administrative procedures; it is not a cybersecurity sanctions instrument.
In force since 1 July 2026. Preserved levels must meet this Law's requirements by 30 June 2027 (Article 45(1)).
Vietnamese agencies, organizations and individuals, and foreign agencies, organizations and individuals in Vietnam. People of Vietnamese origin living in Vietnam whose nationality is undetermined and who hold an identity certificate. Also foreign agencies, organizations and individuals directly participating in or connected with cybersecurity protection or cybersecurity products/services business in Vietnam (Article 1(2))
Article 44(2) ends Law 24/2018/QH14 and Law 86/2015/QH13, as amended. Article 45(1) preserves levels determined under the latter regime, implemented by Decree 85/2016; historical records and work already under way may still matter.
Data security, provider response, cybersecurity incidents, authority requests, protected users, security governance, localization readiness and supporting evidence.
Incident records, decisions, approvals, authority interactions, control evidence, remediation and audit history.
Four decrees in force since 19 August 2026: general implementation, information-systems protection, violating-information handling, and products and services licensing. A false-information decree in force from 5 October 2026. A civil-cryptography decree in force since 1 September 2026. Decree 343 on Ministry of National Defence cybersecurity duties and information-conflict response, in force since 3 September 2026. And the shared Decree 330 sanctions.
The Law treats data security as its own part of cybersecurity, so readiness work needs to cover the whole data lifecycle. That means collection, processing, storage, transmission, sharing, access, encryption, personnel controls, risk assessment and cross-border activity. It also means protecting important databases, data centres and storage systems. Personal data may bring separate duties under the Personal Data Protection Law; one law does not replace the other.
Prohibited conduct includes unlawfully using artificial intelligence or new technology to impersonate another person's video, image or voice, alongside false and fabricated information. Providers need technical measures and usable reporting routes for content harmful to children. For children using value-added cyberspace services, parents or civil-law guardians register accounts with their own details and supervise the content children access, post and share (Article 16(2)). Article 16(5) requires relevant people and organizations to protect children's rights online.
Cybersecurity education and guidance prioritize children, older people and people with cognitive difficulties so they can protect their rights and interests online (Article 35(1)).
Records made under the earlier law may still matter for past periods, contracts, incidents and regulator review during the transition.
Vietnam now has two five-level scales for information systems, and a level must always name the one it was set under. In both, cấp độ 1 is the lowest and cấp độ 5 the highest. Both assess potential harm, with different detailed criteria.
Article 9 of the new Law is separate again. It lets the Prime Minister designate a system as important to national security, on the Ministry of Public Security's proposal. That is a designation, not a level.
Decree 333/2026/NĐ-CP is the general implementing decree, issued and in force since 19 August 2026. It sets out the procedures for cybersecurity protection measures, the IP identification regime and the certified training rollout. It also sets the duties of covered providers:
Whether a specific service is a covered provider depends on a definition that refers to telecom law, so unclear cases need legal analysis of the actual deployment. The decree replaces an earlier consultation draft.
The Ministry of Public Security's draft circular on specialist cybersecurity training would implement the training regime of Decree 333/2026/NĐ-CP: the curriculum, course and annual reports, certificates, the recognition of foreign certificates, and a Ministry-run management system. It is open for comment from 9 to 19 October 2026. It is not issued, carries no number, and its effective date is blank. It does not amend Decree 333.
Decree 331/2026/NĐ-CP, issued and in force since 19 August 2026, sets out how systems are graded under the new Law's five levels. It covers:
Decree 331 repeals nothing. Decree 85/2016 remains the transitional regime for existing systems while the new duties phase in. Decree 331 replaces an earlier priority draft.
Decree 327/2026/NĐ-CP sets out how to prevent and handle violating information and acts in cyberspace. It was issued and took effect on 19 August 2026, with no transitional period. It covers:
Decree 332/2026/NĐ-CP, issued and in force since 19 August 2026, defines which cybersecurity products and services are regulated: 8 product and 11 service categories. It sets the conditions and deadlines for the 10-year trading licence, and none of its conditions is a capital threshold. Contracts signed before it took effect continue, but there is no general grace period for operating without a licence.
Decree 328/2026/NĐ-CP was issued on 19 August 2026 and takes effect on 5 October 2026. It is signed final law in force from that date. It defines fake and false information and sets a six-step handling process, deadlines for authorities to label and publish, and a 24/7 contact point at each provider. It sets no numeric removal deadline for providers; deadlines triggered by an authority's direction arise under Decree 327.
*Decree 163/2024/NĐ-CP is not a Cybersecurity Law implementing decree. It belongs under the Telecommunications Law, and matters here only where telecom, cloud, data-center, OTT, platform or infrastructure duties overlap with cybersecurity compliance.
Decree 341/2026/NĐ-CP covers civil cryptography under Article 28 and Article 29 of the Law. It was issued and took effect on 1 September 2026. Its commencement does not cancel qualifying earlier licences: Article 45(2) of the Law and Article 18(1) of Decree 341 preserve them until their stated expiry. It requires:
The Government Cipher Committee (Ban Cơ yếu Chính phủ), under the Ministry of National Defence, issues the licences, not the Ministry of Public Security. The Ministry of Public Security licenses only dual-use products with both civil-cryptographic and cybersecurity features, and only after the Committee's written opinion. The decree has no repeal clause and does not name Decree 211/2025. That alone does not establish that both are active. Under Article 57(2) of Law 64/2025/QH15, as amended by Law 87/2025/QH15, continuation of an implementing decree after its parent law lapses requires an official announcement. Review any such announcement and the preserved-licence rules for your filing.
Decree 343/2026/NĐ-CP was issued and took effect on 3 September 2026; the Government's explanatory article followed on 4 September. Its 50 articles cover the Law's provisions within the Ministry of National Defence's remit: military information systems, cybersecurity products and services for military purposes, and preventing and responding to information conflicts.
Decree 330/2026/NĐ-CP sets the penalties for both cybersecurity and personal data protection, in force since 19 August 2026. Its cybersecurity articles include sanctions tied to content-removal deadlines of 24 hours and 6 hours, retention of digital-account device information, IP addresses and login times for at least 90 days (Article 34(1)(c)), and data localization. Decree 333's minimum 12-month system-log retention is a separate rule. Resolution 22/2026/NQ-CP concerns procedural changes; the earlier shared enforcement draft was superseded.
The Cybersecurity Law sits alongside other laws rather than above them:
The official handbook also links the Law to the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime, known as the Hanoi Convention. That covers international cooperation, electronic evidence, data preservation and tracing. It applies only where there is a competent cooperation or investigation context; it is not a routine filing requirement for businesses.

Incidents, from intake to closure.
ComplianceOne takes a cybersecurity incident through assessment, escalation, investigation, remediation and closure. Evidence stays linked to the case, including who contributed, who reviewed and which decisions were approved.
Authority requests you can prove you answered.
For each request you can record the request itself, the verified time it arrived, its scope, the owner, the legal review, the response material, system-log evidence and proof of completion. The 24-hour provider deadline stays separate from the six-hour emergency path and from your own internal incident targets.
Readiness work with owners.
Security, data-lifecycle, protected-user, budget-applicability and localization readiness run as assigned reviews, with control evidence, findings and remediation tasks. Vendor and service-provider dependencies link to the same work, so third-party evidence stays inside the compliance record.
Each transition rule tracked on its own.
The Law's transition rules apply to different things, and each keeps its own evidence:
Penalty exposure on its own track.
Teams can check whether current evidence would support an inspection or enforcement response under Decree 330. Every fine band carries its statutory article and whether it applies to an individual or an organization.
Coordinates investigation, evidence, escalation, remediation, and closure.
Explore Incident OperationsSupports notifications, response records, and authority interactions.
Explore IncidentsTracks recurring data-security, provider-response, protected-user, and transition reviews.
Explore Monitoring ProgramsMaintains access-control and accountability evidence.
Explore Access AccountabilityOrganizes readiness reviews, policy ownership, and regulatory change.
Explore Program Governance


One evidence trail across teams. Incident and authority-response work carries reviewable evidence from the first report to closure.

Clear status, no mixed-up penalties. Transition records, current readiness and Decree 330 penalty exposure stay separate, so nobody reports the wrong status or the wrong fine.

Personal data linked, not merged. When the same event involves personal data, the records connect while each law keeps its own obligations and history.
See how ComplianceOne handles data-security evidence, provider-response deadlines, authority requests, transition records and the full set of implementing decrees.

Law 116/2025/QH15 took effect on 1 July 2026. Article 44(2) ended both Law 24/2018/QH14 and Law 86/2015/QH13, as amended by Law 35/2018/QH14. Article 45 sets three transition rules. Levels determined under Law 86/2015 and Decree 85/2016 are preserved, with twelve months to meet the new conditions. Qualifying earlier licences stay valid until their recorded expiry. Qualifying products, services, solutions and technical means already in use get their own twelve-month conformance period.
They are deadlines for providers to act on a request, under Article 25(2)(b). An in-scope provider has up to 24 hours after a request from the Ministry of Public Security's specialist cybersecurity force to block sharing, delete unlawful information, or remove the affected service or application. The six-hour window applies only to an emergency threat to national security. Neither is a general incident-report deadline.
No. Article 38(1) applies to state bodies, state enterprises, political and socio-political organizations, and publicly funded service units. For them, the 15% minimum applies to qualifying digital-transformation and IT investment programmes, schemes and projects. It is not a universal private-sector percentage.
Yes. Article 45(1) of Law 116/2025/QH15 preserves a level already determined under Law 86/2015/QH13, as amended, and its Decree 85/2016 regime. It gives twelve months from 1 July 2026, to 30 June 2027, to meet the new Law's conditions, standards and protection measures for that level. ComplianceOne keeps the determination visible alongside that date.
Yes. Four decrees were issued on 19 August 2026 and are in force from that date: general implementation (Decree 333), information-systems protection (Decree 331), violating-information handling (Decree 327) and products-and-services business (Decree 332). The false-information decree (Decree 328) has been in force since 5 October 2026. The two consultation drafts that preceded them are superseded. Two more followed in September 2026: civil cryptography (Decree 341), in force since 1 September, and cyber-conflict response (Decree 343), issued and effective on 3 September.

Test incident, authority-response, and transition-readiness workflows with your team.

Review your scope, provider-response evidence, data-security controls and the separate Article 45 transition tracks.