DPO Radio

AesirX ComplianceOne | Decision 20/2025/QĐ-TTg Important and Core Data List

Overview Image

Decision 20/2025/QĐ-TTg: Scope and Current Status

Decision 20/2025/QĐ-TTg Important and Core Data List provides the official important and core data classification list used within the Data Law stack. It is represented according to its implemented legal role and is not promoted into a broader or more binding framework.

Operational themes include classification screening, accountable decisions, inventory linkage, review, and cross-border or security escalation. Teams should confirm applicability and legal interpretation with qualified advisers.

Overview Image

How Decision 20 Relates to the Vietnam Data Law

This instrument sits beneath the Vietnam Data Law, Law 60/2024/QH15. The parent law establishes broad data-governance obligations; Decision 20 supplies the official important/core data classification list that those obligations rely on for screening and escalation. It sets the criteria by which data is designated important or core and prescribes no form of its own.

Decree 165/2025/NĐ-CP and Decree 169/2025/NĐ-CP are the active implementing decrees beneath the same parent law; a dataset matching Decision 20's important or core criteria escalates into the data-governance and cross-border-transfer controls those decrees define.

Cross-links preserve related evidence without duplicating parent obligations or changing the status of neighboring active, draft, guidance, or reference layers.

Explore the Vietnam Data Law

Operational Provisions and Evidence

Operational AreaComplianceOne Support
ApplicabilityRecord scope decisions, owners, and review history.
Operational workAssign tasks, connect supporting evidence, and manage approvals.
ArtifactsDecision 20 is modeled as an official classification list, not an official form pack. ComplianceOne records screening and decisions with internal evidence templates.
Audit readinessPreserve contributor, reviewer, decision, and change history.
Overview Image

How ComplianceOne Supports Decision 20 Compliance

ComplianceOne connects structured records, supporting evidence, assigned owners, and human review. Authority-issued artifacts retain source labels; platform-prepared templates remain clearly identified as operational aids.

The platform helps prepare authority-ready or audit-ready packages where the implemented pack supports them. It does not guarantee compliance, legal validity, certification, or acceptance by an authority.

Compliance Readiness Checklist

Confirm applicability and current instrument status.

Assign accountable owners and reviewers.

Select official artifacts only where source-verified.

Link supporting evidence and related framework records.

Record human review and approval.

Retain audit history for later inspection.

Background Image

See Decision 20 Compliance in Action

See how ComplianceOne connects official forms to procedures, risk records, evidence, and approval.

Demo Image
Ronni K. Gothard Christiansen

Ronni K. Gothard Christiansen - Technical Privacy Engineer & CEO

Technical Compliance Expert, 32+ Years Open Source Advocate, X-BoD Open Source Matters Inc.

Or contact via

ronni@aesirx.io+84 909 500 760

Frequently Asked Questions

It is active official list and represented separately from draft, roadmap, or neighboring framework layers.

It adds a narrower operational layer beneath the parent while retaining its own code, status, evidence, and review context.

Decision 20 carries no official forms of its own, so there is nothing authority-issued to distinguish here: ComplianceOne records important/core screening and classification decisions using internal evidence templates, labelled as platform-prepared working documents. Where a match escalates to Decree 165 or Decree 169, those instruments' own verified official forms retain their separate source labels.

No. Decision 20/2025/QĐ-TTg is modeled as an official classification list rather than an official form pack – it sets the criteria for designating data important or core. ComplianceOne records screening and classification decisions using internal evidence templates rather than government-issued forms.

Yes. Related records can be cross-linked while preserving their original framework ownership and audit history.

Next Steps

Icon Image

Start a Compliance Pilot

Test Decision 20 forms, evidence, procedures, and review gates with your team.

Icon Image

Discuss Your Compliance Needs

Review your Decision 20 evidence sources, owners, and authority-readiness process.