Projects | Forseti AI

Document review work – redlining a vendor DPA, reviewing a set of data processing agreements against PDPL requirements, comparing contract obligations across a supplier portfolio – does not fit into a single chat. It spans multiple documents, multiple rounds of review, multiple team members, and multiple weeks. When that work lives in email threads, shared drives, and ad-hoc Forseti conversations, the programme loses its audit trail, access control becomes bespoke per asset, and recovering accidentally deleted work is often impossible.

Forseti Projects solve this by giving document-intensive compliance work a structured home inside the platform. A project carries documents, conversations, workflow runs, and reviews under one container. The AI-suggested redlines on an uploaded contract DPA, the tabular review comparing N vendor agreements on M clauses, the follow-up conversations with the legal team, all of it lives in one place, accessible to the right people, organised in a folder tree that reflects how the work is actually structured.

The document review connection is intentional. Projects are the surface where uploaded documents enter Forseti's review workflow. When you add a contract or policy memo to a project, the document becomes available for the redline review flow, the tabular extraction grid, and grounded chat conversations – without duplicating the file or breaking the attachment's existing audit linkages. Removing a document from a project removes access; it does not delete the underlying attachment from the platform record it belongs to.

Access control is enforced at the project level, not the document level. Members join by user or by organisation group. The two modes are mutually exclusive per access entry so each membership row is unambiguous. Projects support the quarterly rhythms, the annual programmes, and the multi-team reviews that routine compliance operations demand.